MI: -file-list-exec-source-files

[Nick Roberts]

 > Perhaps, but in working on the UI for other debuggers, I have seen this and 
 > it looked like the same situation.  When I worked on Compaq ladebug, we had 
 > to get the list of source files so that the user could choose one to set 
 > bpts in, or to browse.  In retrieving that list from the debugger, I saw e
 > xactly what Nick is seeing.  And in delving into the internals of the 
 > debugger/compiler, I found that the situation I described, with foo.? to 
 > be why I saw more than one source.  This is especially true for C++ when
 > templates are used.   What you really want to see in a list like this is 
 > "foo.c compiled this way", "foo.c compiled that way", and so on.  I don't 
 > think any debugger has solved this problem reasonably from a UI perspective.

I think it's always best to start with the simplest case:

mytest.c:

main ()
{
  myproc ();
}


myproc.c:

myproc ()
{
  return 0;
}

With gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 20060304 (Red Hat 4.1.0-3)
cc -g -c myproc.c
cc -g -o mytest mytest.c myproc.o

With GNU gdb 6.5.50.20060601-cvs, I get:

(gdb)
-file-list-exec-source-files
^done,files=[{file="myproc.c",fullname="/home/nickrob/myproc.c"},{file="myproc.c",fullname="/home/nickrob/myproc.c"},{file="mytest.c",fullname="/home/nickrob/mytest.c"},{file="mytest.c",fullname="/home/nickrob/mytest.c"}]

>From what people have said, I guess a different compiler may give a different
result.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob