How about remote MI?

[teawater]

Agree with you.

Thanks,
teawater

On 7/17/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:50:54PM +0800, teawater wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > In May, I release GDBRUI(http://sourceforge.net/projects/gdbrui/) that
> > is an interpreter to make GDB can be controlled by the other programe
> > through TCP. But some people ask me why not extend MI to support TCP.
> > Now, I think this idea is cool. Does GDB MI support TCP? Maybe I can
> > extend MI to support TCP. How do you think about it?
>
> I do not see the point.  GDB/MI talks to a terminal or a pipe.  If you
> want to connect that pipe to a TCP socket, GDB doesn't need to know
> that it's a socket.
>
> You can use netcat to connect an arbitrary process to a bidirectional TCP
> socket.  There's a bunch of other similar tools, too.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery
>