MI -break-info command issues

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:59:56PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> If "minimal" protocol is explicitly not a goal of MI, or changing MI is
> prohibited, just say so and I'll stop asking why there are unnecessary
> fields.

_Extending_ MI is fine; it was designed to be extensible.  _Removing_
fields from MI is not fine, because you don't know if some other
frontend relies on the data that you find superfluous.

Folks have said this at least twice in this thread already.  If you
disagree, could you say why?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery