MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints
Eli Zaretskii
eliz@gnu.org
Sat Feb 18 15:47:00 GMT 2006
> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:56:45 -0500
> From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, ghost@cs.msu.su, gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> However, the fact that some architectures have imprecise watchpoints
> is no reason to force imprecision on those that can do better.
What do you mean by ``do better''? Should we back up PC to the
instruction that triggered the watchpoint? If we do, then when we
continue, the watchpoint will trigger again and again, ad nauseam.
More information about the Gdb
mailing list