MI error messages

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:54:08PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From:  Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> > Date:  Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:35:08 +0300
> > 
> > 1. Is it guaranteed that all MI error message start with function name and a
> > semicolon?
> 
> I see a small number of error messages that don't, but those are
> probably bugs that need to be fixed.

Really?  Why?  I don't think the function name adds much value in
user-level error messages.  Internal errors, sure.

It is certainly not guaranteed; there's no separation between "MI error
messages" and "other GDB error messages" since an MI session can
reach just about any call to error() in the sources.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery