Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs

[Michael Matz]

Hi,

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> > Really?  Well, that's one interpretation.  I don't believe that, 
> > though.  It's certainly an inconsistency in the specification, which 
> > says that null-termination is supported, and this implies that you 
> > can't put a zero in there.
> 
> Again, this is just because the "authors" of the ABI didn't think.

[Blaeh, Ulrich talk] No, I think it's because the "readers" of the ABI 
can't read.


Ciao,
Michael.