GDB 6.5.90 available for testing (GDB 6.6 pre-release)

[Markus Deuling]

Hello all,

Markus Deuling schrieb:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Mark Kettenis schrieb:
>>>  Here's the patch I've been using for this.  It'd be better to rework
>>>  the way those functions use those obstacks, but...
>>>
>>>  2006-12-05  Jim Blandy  <jimb@codesourcery.com>
>>>
>>>        * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields, cp_print_value):
>>>        Initialize tmp_obstack, to avoid warnings.
>>>        * p-valprint.c (pascal_object_print_value_fields)
>>>        (pascal_object_print_value): Same.
>>
>> This is silly, at least if they are really unecessary.  It's a bug in GCC
>> and should be fixed.  I mean, GCC should get better at detecting this 
>> sort
>> of things; not give more false positives.
>>
>> Markus, can you file a GCC bug report for this?
> 
> I opened a GCC bugzilla:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30086

the GCC Bugzilla I opened was marked duplicated. This is the current 
bugzilla for this topic:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035


Regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com