Unreasonable expectation in gdb.base/break.exp

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:02:27PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> I think this is perfectly reasonable and correct behavior on
> both gdb's and gcc's part, and this check in break.exp should
> be made a little bit more leanient.
> 
> Any objections?

That seems reasonable to me, but what do you propose testing for
instead?  I suppose if we don't check the source file, we'll still be
able to check the function name when we hit the breakpoint.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery