info types question

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 12:01:54AM +0100, Stefan Burström wrote:
> I was wondering what kind of output I can expect from 'info types'?
> I am getting some sensible output such as
> 
> typedef int mytype;
> 
> but I am also getting output such as
> 
> typedef double;
> 
> and
> 
> typedef long long unsigned int;
> 
> The former I guess doesn't really matter, but the later really defines int
> to be an unsigned 64 bit type. Which cannot be what is desired?
> Of course I can ignore all types defined int libgcc2.c but I'd like to find
> out the 'logic' behind this.

These probably indicate "typedefs" without a name, probably definitions
of base types.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC