Maintainer policy for GDB

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Fri Nov 18 03:30:00 GMT 2005


On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:26:44PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > I think gdbint.texi should document what is implemented, and not what
> > > will be implemented.  A Wiki seems to be a more appropriate place for
> > > roadmap items.  They can be moved to gdbint.texi when they've been
> > > implemented.
> > 
> > OK.  No objection to referencing a Wiki (by nature a live document)
> > from MAINTAINERS?
> 
> How about the website itself? Is a Wiki really better for that purpose?

I think that a wiki is more useful for something intended to be
free-form and informal, describing the current state of GDB and
people's half-baked plans.  The web site should be more polished.

Just my two cents, though.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC



More information about the Gdb mailing list