GDB 4.18 with GCC 3.3.6
Dan Kegel
dank@kegel.com
Fri Jul 8 14:50:00 GMT 2005
Matthew J Fletcher wrote:
>>I'm putting together a performance regression benchmark
>>suite right now by pulling together all the known microbenchmarks
>>that run slower on newer versions of gcc, in hopes
>>of helping make sure that gcc-4.1 resolves most of them.
>
> i would be very interested in your preliminary results if you have any.
>
> maybe your going to test 2.95.3 / 3.3.6 / 3.4.4 / 4.0.1 / 4.1.x with C based
> benchmarks, but i would be also very intrested in complex C++ (using stl
> features) for the same set of compilers, as my 'embedded' application is
> written in complex c++.
Some of our tests come from bug reports in gcc bugzilla,
but most so far come from bench++. At least a couple
involve c++. You can see those by running bench++ yourself,
it's pretty good once you get past the setup hurdles
(like, it wants you to install ksh!). It's at
http://www.research.att.com/~orost/bench_plus_plus.html
--
Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
More information about the Gdb
mailing list