Still problems with gdb and nested functions.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:15:11 -0800
> From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU>
> 
> > No symbol "k" in current context.
> 
> I presume you have confirmed that k is actually there (since it is set
> only from a constant, it could be folded away even without fancy
> optimization).

AFAIK, GCC never optimizes _anything_ under -O0, not even redundant
register reloads.

Anyway, the disassembly I posted shows that k does in fact exist and
is stored on the stack, as expected.