MI output change

Bob Rossi bob@brasko.net
Wed Feb 9 04:51:00 GMT 2005


On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:21:46AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Two ya's, no Na's.  All but 'done' :-/
> >Hello,

Has this patch been committed yet? The last failing MI testcase I have
in the syntax checked MI testsuite is one related to this problem.

If you've committed the change for this, I still have an example that
behaves as below.

Bob Rossi

> >The MI output is currently littered with:
> >
> >(gdb)
> >PASS: gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp: create lsimple->integer
> >-var-create int * int
> >&"Attempt to use a type name as an expression.\n"
> >&"mi_cmd_var_create: unable to create variable object\n"
> >^error,msg="mi_cmd_var_create: unable to create variable object"
> >(gdb)
> >
> >(note how the error appears as both the result and as standard out)
> >
> >My recent exception handling rewrite means that this can finally be 
> >fixed.  However that means that the MI output has technically changed - 
> >no one should be relying on the message appearing on stdout but hey ...
> >
> >Is this going to be an issue?
> >
> >Andrew
> >



More information about the Gdb mailing list