Constructor names in the symbol table

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:03:50PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> When I do something like set a breakpoint on S::S(int), I don't get a
> match from the full symbol table; instead, I get a match on the
> demangled names in the minimal symbol table.
> 
> Is this the way it's supposed to work?  I would have expected
> something in dwarf2read to have consulted processing_current_prefix
> and produced a qualified name for the full symbol.

I don't remember the details, but I believe this is part of the mess
caused by normally using mangled names.  But since the constructor is
abstract, it doesn't have a mangled name.

Probably producing a fully qualified name, when we don't have a linkage
name, would work.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz