probing GDB for MI versions
Eli Zaretskii
eliz@gnu.org
Sun Oct 17 18:59:00 GMT 2004
> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:46:11 -0400
> From: 'Bob Rossi' <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> You think that GDB does and will only test one version of the MI
> protocol.
It's not what I think, it's what Andrew said was the policy.
> * Will GDB support more than one stable MI protocols for an official release?
> In the past GDB tested both mi1 and mi2 so that that stage they were
> probably described as "supported". Now that only mi2 is tested, nad mi1 is
> deprecated, your call.
>
> With this in mind, I do not think it is OK to print the latest stable
> version only. It does not tell the front end what other versions could
> be stable.
IIRC, MI1's tests were removed from the CVS as soon as MI2 was deemed
stable enough. So this example doesn't conflict with what I said.
Anyway, I already suggested to have a list of versions printed at
startup time, if you still think several tested versions of MI will be
available. We seem to go in circles since then.
More information about the Gdb
mailing list