gcc/intl vs. src/intl

[Ian Lance Taylor]

So, I notice that gcc/intl and src/intl are pretty different.  And I
wonder how this can possibly work in the context of uberbaum.  I
suppose it will work fine on a host on which all the intl code can be
found in libc with no other dependencies--such as GNU/Linux.  On such
a host the intl directory will not be built, and code will simply link
with -lc.  But on a host in which gcc/intl requires -liconv--such as
NetBSD, or Cygwin--the differing expectations of gcc/intl and src/intl
will cause conflict.

Has anybody looked into resolving this?  Presumably the correct
short-term fix is to bring gcc/intl over to src/intl, and update the
Makefiles accordingly.  Presumably the long-term fix would to keep
intl in sync as we keep libiberty in sync.  Does anybody have a better
idea?

Ian