[maint] [maint] Michael Chastain for testsuite

Christopher Faylor me@cgf.cx
Fri Jun 4 23:57:00 GMT 2004

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 07:37:26PM -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>Chris Faylor writes:
>cgf> If we have someone as a maintainer then it seems like their area of
>cgf> maintainership should reflect their vision, i.e.  you can't just give
>cgf> carte blanche to a group people to do whatever they want in that arena.
>I think it might be good for me to state my vision.  This is all
>stuff that y'all know about me already.
>(1) Copyright -- is the most important thing to me.  I want every file
>    in testsuite/ to bear a valid FSF copyright notice.
>(2) Testing submissions -- I mean to require that every patch says
>    how it was tested (or not tested).  I don't think it's useful
>    to formalize or standardize how a patch is tested beyond that.

Does that translate into every bug reported eventually gets a test?
Would it make sense to add the test for a reported bug before a patch to
fix it is submitted?

I don't know who would be tasked with doing something like that but it
would sort of make sure that no bug was lost as the test suite FAILs
steadily rise...


More information about the Gdb mailing list