remote protocol support for TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:06:15 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > 
> > Er, no.  "Enn" as a reply packet is a fundamental part of the protocol 
> > and can't be removed.  Whats lacking is the formal specification of its 
> > contents.  For the moment I'd leave that part of roland's doco as is.
> 
> Yeah, I agree.  Eli, it does have a useful meaning: it means that an
> error occured.  It just neglects to tell us _what_ :)

Sorry, I must be misunderstanding the issue.  So, once again, could
someone please explain to my confused self what is the meaning of "NN"
in "ENN"?