Branch created for inter-compilation-unit references

[Andrew Cagney]

> 
> On Feb 25, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>>>>  the constant schedule slip, ...
>>>>
>>> tree-ssa was never on a schedule to begin with, so what the heck are you talking about?
>>> If you really want to play that card, it wasn't even supposed to be ready before 3.6
>>> The fact that it is ready for 3.5 means it certainly hasn't *slipped*.
>>
>>
>> Er, it was originally, lets say, "hopeing" for 3.4 (or was it 3.3).
> 
> Sorry.
> This simply isn't true.
> Nobody involved thought it would be ready for 3.4. 

I guess we just talk to different people :-/

Andrew