remote protocol support for TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:34:16 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > 
> > Does anybody know what's the story here, why ENN is printed and what
> > it should be?  Is this perhaps a bug?
> 
> It predates my work with gdbserver.  My guess is that someone saw ENN
> in the manual, realized that GDB didn't parse the error numbers to do
> anything useful, and decided not to bother coming up with some.

If so, I think we should simply remove the ENN thing (and update the
docs accordingly).  It doesn't make sense, IMHO, to print a string
that has no useful meaning.

Do you agree?