How big should bigcore.core be?
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Thu Feb 19 23:33:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:27:50PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >If the latter is true, I really think we should disable this test by
> >default and only enable it on systems where we know we won't generate
> >ridiculously large files running the risk of crashing the machine.
> >For my work on GDB, I regularly use machines that are not mine, and
> >I'd really hate it if I crashed those.
>
> It's catch-22. As seen with the assembler tests, unless these are
> enabled, everyone ignores them :-(
But Mark has a point in that the unimplemented assembler tests are a
lot less problematic for the host system than this test. How about a
list of systems to run on, a list of systems not safe to run on, and
issuing an UNTESTED for everything else?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb
mailing list