Why does solib_open do what it does?
Michael Snyder
msnyder@redhat.com
Wed Jun 18 18:52:00 GMT 2003
Kris Warkentin wrote:
> I believe the comment does not accurately reflect the code. Here is my
> proposal for the new comment using the search algorithm rather than search
> order:
>
> Search algorithm:
> * If there is a solib_absolute_prefix and path is absolute:
> * Search for solib_absolute_prefix/path.
> * else
> * Look for it literally (unmodified).
> * Look in SOLIB_SEARCH_PATH.
I'm not sure -- but do you think it should be
/SOLIB_ABSOLUTE_PREFIX/SOLIB_SEARCH_PATH?
Or maybe both?
> * If available, use target defined search function.
> * Look in inferior's $PATH.
> * Look in inferior's $LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
I rather think that $PATH and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be native-only.
But come to think of it, do remote targets even have environment variables?
And if so -- do they inherit them from gdb / the host? If there's a
gdbserver-type situation, and if the server is able to provide the true
environment variables from the target, then yes, we should use these.
But I don't recall any gdbserver ever offering that functionality.
> The code seems to make the meaning of solib_ABSOLUTE_prefix somewhat more
> literal.
I think it's supposed to be literal.
> It's only used if the path is absolute. Then the question is, do
> we think this is correct? Should we be searching literally at this point or
> defer that until later?
>
> cheers,
>
> Kris
>
>
>
More information about the Gdb
mailing list