Function addresses on the AVR

Jim Blandy jimb@redhat.com
Fri Jun 13 20:32:00 GMT 2003


"Theodore A. Roth" <troth@openavr.org> writes:
> I've changed the ADDRESS_TO_POINTER and POINTER_TO_ADDRESS methods to
> do the bit shift for code addrs and removed the
> CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR method. I can't see that it negatively
> affects either what is in cvs or the new code I'm working on
> (frame-ifying the avr), so it looks like your analysis is correct.
> 
> I'll commit the changes after I've done a bit more testing (I still
> don't have the testsuite running for avr yet :-\ ). That will remove
> one more instance of CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR for you.

Great --- thanks!

> Thanks for digging through the avr stuff.

No problem!



More information about the Gdb mailing list