Libiberty licensing problems & solutions [DRAFT]

[David Carlton]

On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:43:32 -0400, Kelley Cook <kcook34@ford.com> said:

>>> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:32:58 -0400
>>> From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>

>>> I'm opposed to the GFDL, particularly with "Invariant Sections"

>> Can you tell why?

> Please do not continue this subthread on the gdb, gcc, or binutils
> lists as is it is not on-topic.

> A lively discussion on this topic which does include RMS, has been
> going on the Debian-Legal ListServ
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/) for months now.

Thanks for the reference; interesting.  I'm not at all impressed by
the FSF's behavior in this instance. :-(  Of course, it's not like
I've been contributing much to GDB's manual in the first place...

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu