IBM S/390 prologue analysis revisited

[Elena Zannoni]

Kevin Buettner writes:
 > On Jun 30,  6:22pm, Jim Blandy wrote:
 > 
 > > So, how do you folks feel the balance falls?
 > 
 > I'd like to see your patch go in, if for no other reason than that
 > it'll help provide better backtraces for executables which lack
 > debugging information.  (DWARF CFI won't always be available,
 > will it?)
 > 

yeah, I agree.

 > Also, I happen to think that the implementation is pretty cool and I
 > think it'd be worth having around as a good example of how to
 > implement a prologue analyzer.
 > 

yes, please

elena


 > Kevin