GDB respin

[Andrew Cagney]

> [I'm partially back.  I can read my mail, and I can run my test bed,
>  but I'm not caught up on stuff.  -- Michael C]
> 
> Andrew Cagney asks:
> 
>> Should there be a 5.3.1.  So far not much has been comitted to the 
>> branch.  However, there have been a number of configure / build bug reports.
> 
> 
> My preference would be to not produce 5.3.1.  It seems like a low-yield
> use of resources to me.
> 
> Are the configure/build problems fixed in HEAD?

No.  Check the bug database for `high' priority `build' problems.

> For those problems which are not fixed in HEAD:
>   we need to do that anyways, no matter what
> 
> For those problems which are fixed in HEAD:
>   ask the bug report submitters to try a HEAD snapshot
>   put the PR's into 'FEEDBACK' state
> 
> Anyways, I will keep testing and reporting on gdb_5_3-branch.
> My test bed role is separate from my loudmouth role.

:-)

In fact, if the console problem can be resolved, I think there is a very 
strong incentive to quickly spin out a 5.4.

Andrew