obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
> Date: 21 Jan 2003 02:32:01 -0500
> 
> GDB seems to support two different ways of doing detailed annotations
> of its output for consumption by other programs: MI and 'set annotate
> 2'.  I don't think annotation level 2 has many active users, if any at
> all.  It pervades GDB's code.  Would it make sense to put 'set
> annotate 2' on the path to obsolescence?

It's possible that RHIDE, the Turbo-C compatible IDE developed for
DJGPP, uses "annotate 2" (RHIDE has the GDB core built into it).  I CC
the DJGPP developers' mailing list, in the hope that someone who knows
more than myself about the debugging engine of RHIDE will tell whether
I'm wrong.