c++/cfront puzzler

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Elena Z says:
> [ezannoni@localhost ezannoni]$ rpm -q --provides libstdc++-2.96-108.7.2
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3  
> libstdc++ = 2.96-108.7.2

Oh, well, one of the mysteries of C++ backwards compatibility.

I say that it's harmless to leave the little block of 'T' code in,
because it will never hurt anything.  Daniel J says that it's harmless
to take it out, because it will never actually be used.  I suspect that
we're both right and that either way will work.

Michael C