Much of remote-utils obsolete now?

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:44:31PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:16:23PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:26:09AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
> > >
> > >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > >>
> > >
> > >>>remote-utils.[ch] claim to be generic support functions, but except for 
> > >>>some
> > >>>stray calls in remote-array.c which could be easily removed, all the
> > >>>references were in the now-obsolete remote-bug.c module.  I'd like to see
> > >>>this code die too, especially the undocumented and pretty much useless
> > >>>"remote" command.
> > >>>
> > >
> > >>remote-utils was obsolete several years ago, and I bet not one single 
> > >>person has used
> > >>remote-array in five years at least.
> > >
> > >
> > >Well, then :)  Andrew, sounds like we have some more obsoletion
> > >candidates.
> > 
> > Yep.  My obsolete queue has maxed out though (until after 5.3 has been 
> > released and I've zapped any of the current stuff).
> > 
> > Perhaphs bug report it so that someone remembers to ``accidently 
> > deleted'' when the i960 stuff goes in ~2 months.
> 
> Check.  It's gdb/685.

Hey, Andrew... should we //OBSOLETE or just ``accidentally delete''
these?  I'm open for either.  That's remote-utils.[ch] and
remote-array.c.

Incidentally, mon960-rom.o can be removed now; nothing left references
it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer