[maint] The GDB maintenance process
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Thu Feb 20 01:53:00 GMT 2003
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:17:09PM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:39:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I know that Jason likes svn but I haven't used it. I'm not sure that
>>it would be easy to convince me to spend any time trying to convert
>>everything to a new source control system. CVS is nice because it
>>lives everywhere and is a known commodity.
>
>I don't think I saw anyone suggesting alternative SCMs... cagney wrote
>"sware, subversion, sourceforge", but he probably meant to write
>"subversions", as in "subversions.gnu.org".
I probably responded one message too late. David Carlton said this:
>It might be nice if GDB were using a source code management tool that
>didn't depend on having a single repository, making it easier for
>people to maintain public branches elsewhere but to still sync them
>with an official branch.
So when I saw Andrew mention subversion, I thought we were still talking
about source control systems rather than systems which run source
control systems.
cgf
More information about the Gdb
mailing list