gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:44:03AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > Nope, there was no PR, just a patch when I noticed it.  Besides, didn't
> > we want to only use PRs in the GDB database?  This would be an
> > external/closed.
> 
> Works for me.  Heck, I think I argued for that position anyways!
> 
> Unfortunately gdb_mi_test does not have a multi-armed form so
> I have to use a blunt setup_kfail.
> 
> I'll go file an external/closed PR for this and then point the
> test case at it.

If you use a setup_kfail, won't it start showing up as a KPASS for all
of us with fixed GCCs?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer