Slow handling of C++ symbol names
Andrew Cagney
cagney@gnu.org
Wed Dec 3 18:52:00 GMT 2003
> Andrew Cagney writes:
>
>> I guess we get to restart the analysis :-(
>
>
> Sounds like a job for GDB QA Guy! :)
>
> I downloaded Will's executables from:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/gdb_tuning/monostrip
> http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/gdb_tuning/monotone
>
> Here are some memory usage and time numbers.
>
> gdb memory utime stime elapsed
> 5.3 263M 84.79 26.52 185.92
> 6.0 263M 83.17 26.45 181.04
> HEAD 43M 2.78 0.27 3.23
>
> gdb HEAD is from '2003-11-30 06:08:24 UTC'.
Michael, not to overload you but would it also be possible to do the
numbers on a just-before-new-mangler-mainline? At present there's a gap
in our knowledge - we don't know the effect that just the demangler
change had. Also lets us compare:
6.0 vs PRE vs POST
Andrew
More information about the Gdb
mailing list