Slow handling of C++ symbol names

Andrew Cagney cagney@gnu.org
Wed Dec 3 18:52:00 GMT 2003


> Andrew Cagney writes:
> 
>> I guess we get to restart the analysis :-(
> 
> 
> Sounds like a job for GDB QA Guy!  :)
> 
> I downloaded Will's executables from:
> 
>   http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/gdb_tuning/monostrip
>   http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/gdb_tuning/monotone
> 
> Here are some memory usage and time numbers.
> 
>   gdb   memory  utime  stime  elapsed
>   5.3   263M    84.79  26.52  185.92
>   6.0   263M    83.17  26.45  181.04
>  HEAD    43M     2.78   0.27    3.23
> 
> gdb HEAD is from '2003-11-30 06:08:24 UTC'.

Michael, not to overload you but would it also be possible to do the 
numbers on a just-before-new-mangler-mainline?  At present there's a gap 
in our knowledge - we don't know the effect that just the demangler 
change had.  Also lets us compare:

	6.0 vs PRE vs POST

Andrew




More information about the Gdb mailing list