Slow handling of C++ symbol names
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@mvista.com
Tue Dec 2 22:29:00 GMT 2003
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:23:16PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes:
>
> > So, the new demangler is printing different, much smaller output.
>
> That's odd. I could understand it if gdb were passing DMGL_VERBOSE to
> cplus_demangle(). But as far as I know it is not doing so in any
> version. Could you extract a few of the larger demangled names from
> each version, and post them? It might be a good double-check that
> something isn't weirdly broken. It would be nice to have the mangled
> symbol name too, but not critical.
>
> Thanks.
My guess is that this has something to do with DMGL_PARAMS. But again
that's odd since we ought to be passing that when we demangle msyms.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb
mailing list