RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:18:51PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> If you're holding onto the thread you're effectively synchronous.  The 
> exchanges:
> 
> 	<- n<new-thread>
> 	-> +
> 
> and
> 
> 	<- T00<new-thread>
> 	-> +$C#..
> 	<- +
> 
> are, only marginally different.
> 
> Should all threads be halted during this exchange?  I think that is a 
> separate question.

I wouldn't call it effectively synchronous - precisely because no other
thread is stopped.  All threads shouldn't be halted, IMO, but I have
no way to tell GDB which are and which are not.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer