[MI] -break-insert: (a)synchronous?

Andrew Cagney ac131313@cygnus.com
Fri Jun 14 11:48:00 GMT 2002

> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:49:53AM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> > This means another MI version bump (currently it is on 1).  See how mi0
>> > vs mi1 was handled (especially in the testsuite).
>> I'll take care of it. Unless I hear otherwise, I will modify the code to
>> support old and new. Are we going to set a date or time limit on
>> deprecating the old mis?
> Please?  In particular, I don't want us to keep accumulating testsuites
> for different protocol versions forever.

I was thinking of having it release or time limited.  One release may 
not be long enough though.  Mind you, at this stage I'm guessing as 
people using MI haven't got their changes merged in.


More information about the Gdb mailing list