[MI] -break-insert: (a)synchronous?

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@mvista.com
Fri Jun 14 11:23:00 GMT 2002


On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:49:53AM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > This means another MI version bump (currently it is on 1).  See how mi0
> > vs mi1 was handled (especially in the testsuite).
> 
> I'll take care of it. Unless I hear otherwise, I will modify the code to
> support old and new. Are we going to set a date or time limit on
> deprecating the old mis?

Please?  In particular, I don't want us to keep accumulating testsuites
for different protocol versions forever.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer



More information about the Gdb mailing list