GDB 5.2 or GDB 5.1.1?

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Andrew Cagney writes:
> Just a postscript to this.   Because the FSF would like to be able to 
> spin out a manual based on a current release but are currently fixing 
> things I'll very likely end up spinning out a 5.1.1 or 5.1.0.2 (ulgh) 
> anyway.  The latter is far far easier.

Another constraint: 5.1.0.2 would be unable to debug -gdwarf-2 code
with gcc-HEAD, which is going to become gcc 3.1 eventually.

(I'm bummed because my overnight test run got stuck in the configuration
of gdb 5.1, gcc HEAD, -gdwarf-2, so I had to kludge around that and
start the test script again).

Michael C