rfc: DW_AT_vector

[Aldy Hernandez]

>  > of course, i'm willing to volunteer to code the DW_TAG_vector_type
>  > stuff, but only as a last and painful resort :).
>  > 
> 
> This would work, yes, even though I would personally prefer to have a
> new vector type. It represents more closely what these vectors really
> are.
> 

why can't you achieve the functionality with DW_AT_vector?  it has the
added benefit that other debuggers can read vectors quite intuitively.

aldy