Prototyped function types
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@mvista.com
Thu Feb 21 13:13:00 GMT 2002
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:06:26PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
>
> (I can't find the old thread on this subject, so I'm starting a new
> one. Sorry.)
>
> I recently added support to GDB for the stabs 'g' type descriptor, as
> described in Sun's STABS manual. I was hoping Daniel would jump in
> and add the corresponding support to gcc/dbxout.c, but he seemed to
> have concerns about the types' syntax.
No, actually, I was hoping Jason would jump in and do it :) He has a
much better understanding of the dbxout code than I do.
> Daniel, I think you were concerned about the lack of separators
> between the argument types; that is, a function taking three ints and
> returning an int will look something like this:
>
> g(0,1)(0,1)(0,1)(0,1)
>
> Since there's no punctuation between the types, this syntax becomes
> ambiguous if you're using the older type number notation, in which
> type numbers are just numbers, not pairs of numbers separated by
> commas and surrounded by parens. Then you'd get:
>
> g1111
>
> which is obviously Not Okay.
>
> However, I don't think this is a problem. The compiler simply
> shouldn't use 'g' if it's not using (file,number) pairs.
>
> But in general, I have no attachment to that particular syntax;
> whatever you propose, I'll try to implement. Do you want semicolons?
> I just want to get this dealt with. :)
I would say "Let's go with whatever Sun is doing". But I have not been
able to get any of the Sun compilers at my disposal (which do neat
things with stabs, by the way - including proper namespace support!) to
produce these descriptors. Perhaps they're too old...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
More information about the Gdb
mailing list