GDB plugin proposal

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> > > RMS's viewpoint isn't legally relevant. He may be right. He may be wrong. 
> > > He claims he's right, but that doesn't make it so.
> > > He'd *like* to be right, but that also doesn't make it so.
> > > Certainly, anything related to law that RMS spouts should be taken with a 
> > > *large* grain of salt.
> > 
> > I think this is terribly unfair, and shouldn't have been sent except
> > perhaps in private email. 
> 
> Errr, how is it unfair?

You said his views are legally irrelevant.  You did that without cc'ing 
him.

> How did i ruin his reputation?
> What have I said that is untrue?

Since when ruining a reputation requires telling untrue things?  Is that 
what they teach you in law schools nowadays?