Andrew Cagney wrote: > > As a corollary, should ``Fix:'' generally be reserved for ``fixes'' - > i.e. patches (Show me the money^D^D^D patch :-). > Yes, that what "Fix:" was meant for, I believe. -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9