5.1 README

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> >> o	it doesn't mention building PDF
> > 
> > This can be easily added.  Should I do that?
> 
> Yes please.

Done.

> > P.S.  Somebody should make sure the PDF version indeed can be built with 
> > the popular version(s) of PDFTeX, before we advertise that.
> 
> 
> Oh, great :-)  How many are there?  Looks like all the machines I have 
> access to have teTeX (of one varity or another) installed.

I think this is enough, especially since we've decided to require
Texinfo 4.0.

(Personally, I like DviPDFm better than PDFTeX, since production of DVI 
files is normally less prone to problems, and DviPDFm has never failed to 
produce a PDF file from a valid DVI.)