5.1 README

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> Several things I've noticed:
> 
> 	o	it recommends a separate build tree
> 		yet gives the same build tree example
> 		first

IIRC, this was discussed in the past, and we decided to leave it as it is 
now.  I don't see anything wrong with the current structure: after all, 
for a typical user, keeping the source directory pristine is not very 
important.  Those who care will read the recommendation and act upon it.

> 	o	it doesn't mention building PDF

This can be easily added.  Should I do that?

P.S.  Somebody should make sure the PDF version indeed can be built with 
the popular version(s) of PDFTeX, before we advertise that.