changelog rotation...

[Kevin Buettner]

On Jan 12, 11:33am, J.T. Conklin wrote:

> >> If we do put each version on its own ChangeLog, we could have
> >> ChangeLog.418, ChangeLog.500, etc.
> 
> Stan> I really like this idea.
> 
> I actually like the split-by-year scheme.  This tends to place about
> the right number of entries in each file regardless of whether there
> are six months or two years between GDB releases.  It makes it easy 
> to go from the mailing list archives to the cooresponding ChangeLog
> file without any guessing.

I agree with J.T.

(I don't normally like "me too" mail, so just consider this as a vote
against any split-by-version scheme.)

Kevin