changelog rotation...

[Stan Shebs]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> I can also suggest alternative schemes that you might want to
> consider.  One possibility is to rename the files to ChangeLog.1,
> ChangeLog.2, ChangeLog.3, etc., starting with the oldest one.  This is
> what Emacs does in its distribution.

Now that I'm working on GCC, I find that this is more puzzling
than the GDB scheme; the names give no information beyond that the
file has been split.

> If we do put each version on its own ChangeLog, we could have
> ChangeLog.418, ChangeLog.500, etc.

I really like this idea.

Stan