changelog rotation...

[J.T. Conklin]

>>>>> "Fernando" == Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> Now that gcc and binutils have rotated ChangeLogs, should we do the
>> same for gdb?  By existing convention, the new ChangeLog file would be
>> ChangeLog-00.
>> 
>> Is there any reason not to use it?  The only drawback is that a sorted
>> directory listing wouldn't keep the files in numerically correct order.
>> 

Fernando> We use 4 digits for gdbtk ChangeLogs.  Maybe we should do
Fernando> this for gdb as well.

I see no reason not to.  If we did, I'd split ChangeLog-9091 into two
files.  There's not much of a reason for it to be one file anyway, if
everything else is split by single years.

        --jtc

-- 
J.T. Conklin
RedBack Networks