Register group proposal

[Andrew Cagney]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:54:19PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >>That works fine if xxx is a struct.  If, at some point, you have an
> >>amazing idea that allows you to change all xxx's to "unsigned short"
> >>you're stuck with a lot of editing.
> >
> >Um, are you being serious here?
> 
> Do you have some kind of problem with this simple concept?  Been programming
> long?

GDB is made up of several objects.  Some have been identified - a frame,
an architecture, the cli output device (ui-file / ui-out), and even a
proposal for reggroup .... Others are still lurking beneath the surface.

I don't think you are seriously suggesting that one of these
``fundamental'' objects - ex ``struct gdbarch *'' - be replaced by
``unsigned short''.

	enjoy,
		Andrew