CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.

[Kevin Buettner]

On Feb 16, 11:57am, J.T. Conklin wrote:

> If I'm not misremembering the 5.0.XX convention (perhaps it's only
> used for formal 5.1 test releases), I'd approve the change.  I
> strongly prefer that form to "-experimental".  But I would prefer
> input from others, cuz it seems somehow wrong to approve your own
> proposal.

I think that 5.0.XX makes sense for the branch that'll eventually be
created for the 5.1 release.  For the development sources, I think
that Michael C's suggestion of "5.1-experimental" (or whatever it was)
is preferable since it also clearly distinguishes between release
candidates and the ongoing development on the trunk.

Kevin