abort() to internal_error()

[Andrew Cagney]

"J.T. Conklin" wrote:

> This is good enough to go in as is, but I wonder if there is any way
> can improve the message.  IMO "function calls abort ()" is wrong, or
> at best misleading, since the function no longer calls abort().
> Perhaps "failed internal consistancy check" is generic enough without
> mentioning abort()?

Thankyou!  I couldn't think of anything sensible.

	Andrew

PS: Must not suggest ``Houston, we have a problem''....