linux-thread.o no longer used

[Jim Blandy]

Okay.  A patch to delete those files is going to look stupid, and it
won't really work (patch just truncates them to zero length, rather
than deleting them).  So may I just `cvs rm' the files, commit the
change, and post a verbal 'PATCH' message to gdb-patches?

Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> writes:

> 
> On Dec 9,  2:29pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > Here I think the code should just go.  We'll (well I'll) otherwize make 
> > the same mestake again of not realizing that something is using legacy code.
> > 
> > This is different to the target case.  In the above, functionality was 
> > replaced.  With deleted targets, we're trying to remove targets.
> 
> That's fine.  I don't have strong feelings about it since I can
> make local copies of the files that I want to refer to.  Plus, they
> are still in the repository (albeit, in the Attic) which means that
> we can still get at them if we want to.
> 
> Kevin
>